Talent Analytics
QUANTIFying the "unquantifiable"
Are your people truly your most valuable resource?
While most executives will agree their talent pool is a critical resource, they are seldom in a position to speak about this talent in a measurable (and contextual) way.
Sample Use Cases include:
Our Abilities - How capable is my team suited to an upcoming core area of investment we are considering? (so that my assessment to peers and leaders is truly accurate)
Our Position - How do we benchmark / compare with others? (so clients choose us over others)
Our Risks - What talent related risks do we face? (retention, skills)
Talent data is comprised of both internal and external information about people, roles, companies and market segments. A core focus of of this research is helping firms/organizations answer these and other practical Talent questions, some strategic, others tactical.
A Peak into the research
HOW DOES YOUR ANALYTICAL TALENT POOL RANK AGAINST OTHERS?
Draft Research Findings - Talent Analysis Samples – FS, Insurance and Banking Public Companies – Visualized
The following samples provide a peek into results of the analytical work we do, evaluating companies and individuals, their capabilities, skills, absolute and relative positions to others in their sectors.
(The higher the values, the stronger the capabilities)
Tabular Summary of Public Firms, as Scored by Analytical Certifications, Courses and Relevant Academic Credentials Held by Technical Talent (higher values = stronger capabilities)
(The higher the scores, the better). Click to download the excel source file.
Company Analytical Strength, via Analysis of Key Analytical Certifications held and Courses undertaken by team members
Researcher Notes: Cluster 1, Magenta, is comprised largely of low to mid strength companies (e.g. Standard Charter, Old National), while Cluster 2 light blue showcases the companies with stronger abilities (e.g. ING, SVB, Blackstone), as measured by the relevant analytical oriented courses taken and certifications held by team members. As shown, companies in the Cluster 3, dark blue, have very strong relative abilities, with companies such as Moody’s, Msci, Amex, First republic and more.
Company Analytical Strength, via Analysis of Key Analytical Certifications and Relevant Academic Degrees held by Team Members
Researcher Notes: Cluster 1, light blue, is comprised largely of low to mid strength companies (e.g. Plumas, Brookfield, Lakeland), while Cluster 2 dark blue showcases the companies with stronger abilities balanced between education and certifications (e.g. First Republic, Arch Insurance, ING). Companies in the dark mustard Cluster 3, have strong educational standing but moderate to strong certifications (Global Payments, Aon, Bank Columbia), while companies such as Msci, Arch Capital, S&P, Moody’s all shine bright in both areas!
Company Analytical Strength, via Analysis of Key Analytical Courses undertaken and Relevant Academic Degrees held by Team Members
Researcher Notes: Cluster light blue, is comprised largely of low strength companies, Cluster mustard showcases the companies with education but weak analytical training courses, Cluster dark blue is similar to mustard only with even stronger education!
Let's Connect
Contact me anytime for collaboration or more